{"id":7110,"date":"2008-04-25T17:26:48","date_gmt":"2008-04-25T17:26:48","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2017-09-04T11:55:44","modified_gmt":"2017-09-04T14:55:44","slug":"amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual","status":"publish","type":"news","link":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/","title":{"rendered":"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL"},"content":{"rendered":"

Declaraci\u00f3n de AmCham ante clasificaci\u00f3n de Chile\u00a0 por segundo a\u00f1o en Priority Watch List<\/em> por parte del USTR de EE.UU<\/strong>.:\u00a0\u00a0 “Le preocupa a la C\u00e1mara Chileno Norteamericana de Comercio (AmCham), que existan visiones diferentes entre los Gobiernos de Chile y EE.UU. en esta materia, especialmente por ser un elemento perturbador en las relaciones comerciales que puede afectar tanto el comercio como las inversiones bilaterales. Lea a continuaci\u00f3n declaraci\u00f3n completa de AmCham y de la USTR.<\/p>\n

Ante la mantenci\u00f3n de Chile en el Priority Watch List por parte de la USTR<\/a>, de Estados Unidos, la C\u00e1mara Chilena Norteamericana de Comercio, AmCham, declara:<\/strong>
\nLa oficina del Representante Comercial de EE.UU., USTR, ha emitido un nuevo informe sobre la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual por parte de pa\u00edses con los que EE.UU. mantiene relaciones comerciales.<\/p>\n

En este informe y por segundo a\u00f1o consecutivo, se ubica a Chile en la lista prioritaria de observaci\u00f3n por, a juicio del gobierno estadounidense, estar muy por debajo de las expectativas para un socio que ha suscrito un TLC con EE.UU.<\/p>\n

Por otra parte, el informe destaca que varios socios comerciales de EE.UU. han tenido avances en la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual, motivo por el cual han sido removidos de la lista prioritaria de observaci\u00f3n.\u00a0\u00a0 Agrega que la implementaci\u00f3n de estos acuerdos de libre comercio han sido importantes elementos en el mejoramiento de la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual.<\/p>\n

La declaraci\u00f3n se produce a pocos d\u00edas de realizarse una mesa redonda con motivo de la celebraci\u00f3n del D\u00eda Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual que AmCham, junto con otras instituciones, patrocin\u00f3 y en la que participaron dos Ministros de Estado.<\/p>\n

En el citado evento se constat\u00f3 que, sin desconocer que ha habido progreso y un esfuerzo del Gobierno por mejorar la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual en el pa\u00eds, a\u00fan hay un amplio consenso respecto de la necesidad de seguir avanzando en mejorar la institucionalidad en esta materia.<\/p>\n

En tal sentido, AmCham se pone a disposici\u00f3n de las autoridades para colaborar a buscar una soluci\u00f3n a este problema que afecta la imagen de Chile como pa\u00eds que respeta sus compromisos internacionales.<\/p>\n

La adecuada protecci\u00f3n a la propiedad intelectual es condici\u00f3n sine qua non para que en el pa\u00eds exista m\u00e1s innovaci\u00f3n y emprendimiento y continuar en la senda hacia una econom\u00eda del conocimiento.
\nSantiago, 25 de Abril, 2008.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Declaraci\u00f3n de la Oficina de Prensa del USTR<\/strong><\/div>\n
The Office of the United States Trade Representative
\n<\/strong>\u00a0Report Highlights Shortfalls in Intellectual Property Protection, Acknowledges Progress by Some U.S. Trading Partners<\/div>\n
WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2013 The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) today released its annual \u201cSpecial 301\u201d Report on the adequacy and effectiveness of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection by U.S. trading partners.<\/div>\n
\u201cThe Special 301 Report spotlights one of the central challenges facing the global economy,\u201d said Ambassador Susan C. Schwab. \u201cPirates and counterfeiters don\u2019t just steal ideas; they steal jobs, and too often they threaten our health and safety.\u00a0 The Administration has been committed to stepping up the fight against IPR infringers who seek to profit from American artists, inventors, and entrepreneurs.\u201d<\/div>\n
As the United States confronts international piracy, counterfeiting, and other forms of IPR theft, the Special 301 Report constitutes a critical policy tool for focusing on urgent problems including the growing problem of Internet piracy and the counterfeiting of pharmaceuticals and other products that threaten the health and safety of consumers around the world.\u00a0 The Report provides a basis for constructive engagement with U.S. trading partners in order to address these challenges, particularly in key countries such as China and Russia.<\/div>\n
\u201cWe continue to work with our Chinese and Russian colleagues to ensure that they deliver on their commitments to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement,\u201d said Schwab.<\/div>\n
\u201cOur bilateral engagement with China, Russia and other trading partners complement our efforts to enforce our rights through the WTO.\u00a0 The Administration will continue to defend vigorously American innovation,\u201d stated Schwab.\u00a0 \u201cU.S. leadership remains critical to improving the global IPR climate.\u201d<\/div>\n
Continuing Concerns in China and Russia<\/div>\n
Again this year, USTR\u2019s Special 301 Report highlights serious IPR concerns with respect to China and Russia, in spite of some evidence of improvement in both countries.<\/div>\n
China<\/div>\n
USTR announced that it will once again retain China on the Priority Watch List and continue monitoring China under Section 306 of the 1974 Trade Act, thus maintaining pressure on China to improve its IPR situation.\u00a0 While the United States continues to seek cooperative channels to work with China to strengthen that country\u2019s IPR regime, high levels of copyright piracy and trademark counterfeiting remain serious concerns.\u00a0 At the same time, the United States is also using the WTO dispute settlement process to address a number of specific deficiencies in China\u2019s IPR regime.<\/div>\n
Russia<\/div>\n
The Administration also continues to work for improvements to the intellectual property regime in Russia.\u00a0 Although Russia has made some progress \u2013 for example, in moving optical disc factories off of government-controlled sites and raiding unlicensed factories \u2013 large-scale production and distribution of IP-infringing optical media and Internet piracy remain significant problems that require more enforcement action.\u00a0 The United States will continue to monitor to ensure that Russia moves to implement a variety of legal and law enforcement improvements to which it committed as part of a bilateral agreement with the United States on Russia\u2019s accession to the WTO.\u00a0 Implementation of these commitments remains essential to completing the final multilateral negotiations on the overall accession package.<\/div>\n
Improvements Noted for Several Trading Partners<\/div>\n
In addition to flagging prominent intellectual property concerns of U.S. trade policy, the Special 301 Report also provides an opportunity to recognize trading partners whose efforts to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement are delivering results both for home-grown innovators in those countries and for U.S. right holders.\u00a0 Egypt, Lebanon, Turkey, and Ukraine are being moved to the Watch List (from Priority Watch List), reflecting improvements in each country\u2019s IPR regime.\u00a0 Two other trading partners \u2013 Belize and Lithuania \u2013 are being removed from the Special 301 Report altogether.<\/div>\n
Background<\/div>\n
This year\u2019s Special 301 Report places forty-six (46) countries on the Priority Watch List, Watch List, or the Section 306 monitoring list.<\/div>\n
There are nine (9) countries on this year\u2019s Priority Watch List: China, Russia, Argentina, Chile, India, Israel, Pakistan, Thailand, and Venezuela.\u00a0 Countries on the Priority Watch List do not provide an adequate level of IPR protection or enforcement, or market access for persons relying on intellectual property protection, in absolute terms and\/or relative to a range of factors such as their level of development.\u00a0 Priority Watch List countries will be the subject of particularly intense engagement through bilateral discussion during the coming year.<\/div>\n
Thirty-six (36) trading partners are on the lower level Watch List, meriting bilateral attention to address IPR problems:\u00a0 Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.<\/div>\n
The Administration will conduct Out-of-Cycle Reviews for Taiwan and Israel to assess progress on specific IPR issues.<\/div>\n
Canada has taken some significant steps in the past year and, given the importance of the outstanding issues and maturity of its economy, we look forward to additional action in the coming months on the IP reforms identified as key priorities by the Government of Canada.<\/div>\n
Paraguay will continue to be subject to Section 306 monitoring under a bilateral Memorandum of Understanding that establishes objectives and actions for addressing IPR concerns in that country.<\/div>\n
The implementation of Free Trade Agreements (FTA) negotiated with the United States constitutes an important element in IPR improvements.\u00a0 FTA partner countries have undertaken important improvements in IPR legal frameworks in keeping with the obligations reflected in the FTAs.\u00a0 Our most recent FTAs also reflect these high standards and we welcome the commitments made to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement by future FTA trading partners, including Colombia, Panama and Korea.<\/div>\n
On October 23, 2007, United States Trade Representative Susan Schwab announced that the U.S. Government will seek to negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).\u00a0 This is a new and dynamic effort to combat the challenges of counterfeiting and piracy today.\u00a0 The ACTA is envisioned as a leadership effort among trading partners that will raise the international standard for IPR enforcement.<\/div>\n
Despite some encouraging developments, the detailed country discussions in the Special 301 Report make clear that numerous IPR problems persist around the world.\u00a0 Trade in counterfeit pharmaceuticals continues to be a particularly grave concern in light of the risks to human health and safety, and the United States continues to be actively engaged in addressing this serious problem.\u00a0 The United States will also remain focused on combating large-scale piracy of optical media and the widespread counterfeiting of trademark-protected consumer and industrial goods.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Parrafo especial sobre Chile extra\u00eddo del documento oficial:<\/strong><\/div>\n
CHILE
\nChile will remain on the Priority Watch List in 2008. Chile\u2019s IPR performance continues to fall well below expectations for a U.S. free trade agreement partner. The United States remains concerned about inadequate protection against unfair commercial use of undisclosed test and other data generated to obtain marketing approval for pharmaceutical products and insufficient coordination between Chile\u2019s health and patent authorities to prevent the issuance of marketing approvals for unauthorized copies of patented pharmaceutical products. While some U.S. pharmaceutical companies have reported positive outcomes in patent infringement cases, the underlying weaknesses in Chile\u2019s legal regime require resolution in order for Chile to fully implement its obligations under the U.S.-Chile FTA Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The United States also remains concerned about continuing copyright piracy and trademark counterfeiting. Chile\u2019s Congress is continuing to consider legislation to implement various provisions of the FTA regarding Internet service provider liability, limitations and exceptions to copyright protection, and enforcement and penalties against copyright infringement. Further amendments to Chile\u2019s IPR legislation are needed to bring Chile\u2019s IPR regime into line with its multilateral and bilateral commitments. The United States will continue to work together with Chile on the implementation of its IPR commitments in the FTA.<\/div>\n

Declaraci\u00f3n de AmCham ante clasificaci\u00f3n de Chile\u00a0 por segundo a\u00f1o en Priority Watch List<\/em> por parte del USTR de EE.UU<\/strong>.:\u00a0\u00a0 “Le preocupa a la C\u00e1mara Chileno Norteamericana de Comercio (AmCham), que existan visiones diferentes entre los Gobiernos de Chile y EE.UU. en esta materia, especialmente por ser un elemento perturbador en las relaciones comerciales que puede afectar tanto el comercio como las inversiones bilaterales. Lea a continuaci\u00f3n declaraci\u00f3n completa de AmCham y de la USTR.<\/p>\n

Ante la mantenci\u00f3n de Chile en el Priority Watch List por parte de la USTR<\/a>, de Estados Unidos, la C\u00e1mara Chilena Norteamericana de Comercio, AmCham, declara:<\/strong>
\nLa oficina del Representante Comercial de EE.UU., USTR, ha emitido un nuevo informe sobre la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual por parte de pa\u00edses con los que EE.UU. mantiene relaciones comerciales.<\/p>\n

En este informe y por segundo a\u00f1o consecutivo, se ubica a Chile en la lista prioritaria de observaci\u00f3n por, a juicio del gobierno estadounidense, estar muy por debajo de las expectativas para un socio que ha suscrito un TLC con EE.UU.<\/p>\n

Por otra parte, el informe destaca que varios socios comerciales de EE.UU. han tenido avances en la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual, motivo por el cual han sido removidos de la lista prioritaria de observaci\u00f3n.\u00a0\u00a0 Agrega que la implementaci\u00f3n de estos acuerdos de libre comercio han sido importantes elementos en el mejoramiento de la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual.<\/p>\n

La declaraci\u00f3n se produce a pocos d\u00edas de realizarse una mesa redonda con motivo de la celebraci\u00f3n del D\u00eda Mundial de la Propiedad Intelectual que AmCham, junto con otras instituciones, patrocin\u00f3 y en la que participaron dos Ministros de Estado.<\/p>\n

En el citado evento se constat\u00f3 que, sin desconocer que ha habido progreso y un esfuerzo del Gobierno por mejorar la protecci\u00f3n de la propiedad intelectual en el pa\u00eds, a\u00fan hay un amplio consenso respecto de la necesidad de seguir avanzando en mejorar la institucionalidad en esta materia.<\/p>\n

En tal sentido, AmCham se pone a disposici\u00f3n de las autoridades para colaborar a buscar una soluci\u00f3n a este problema que afecta la imagen de Chile como pa\u00eds que respeta sus compromisos internacionales.<\/p>\n

La adecuada protecci\u00f3n a la propiedad intelectual es condici\u00f3n sine qua non para que en el pa\u00eds exista m\u00e1s innovaci\u00f3n y emprendimiento y continuar en la senda hacia una econom\u00eda del conocimiento.
\nSantiago, 25 de Abril, 2008.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Declaraci\u00f3n de la Oficina de Prensa del USTR<\/strong><\/div>\n
The Office of the United States Trade Representative
\n<\/strong>\u00a0Report Highlights Shortfalls in Intellectual Property Protection, Acknowledges Progress by Some U.S. Trading Partners<\/div>\n
WASHINGTON, D.C. \u2013 The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) today released its annual \u201cSpecial 301\u201d Report on the adequacy and effectiveness of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection by U.S. trading partners.<\/div>\n
\u201cThe Special 301 Report spotlights one of the central challenges facing the global economy,\u201d said Ambassador Susan C. Schwab. \u201cPirates and counterfeiters don\u2019t just steal ideas; they steal jobs, and too often they threaten our health and safety.\u00a0 The Administration has been committed to stepping up the fight against IPR infringers who seek to profit from American artists, inventors, and entrepreneurs.\u201d<\/div>\n
As the United States confronts international piracy, counterfeiting, and other forms of IPR theft, the Special 301 Report constitutes a critical policy tool for focusing on urgent problems including the growing problem of Internet piracy and the counterfeiting of pharmaceuticals and other products that threaten the health and safety of consumers around the world.\u00a0 The Report provides a basis for constructive engagement with U.S. trading partners in order to address these challenges, particularly in key countries such as China and Russia.<\/div>\n
\u201cWe continue to work with our Chinese and Russian colleagues to ensure that they deliver on their commitments to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement,\u201d said Schwab.<\/div>\n
\u201cOur bilateral engagement with China, Russia and other trading partners complement our efforts to enforce our rights through the WTO.\u00a0 The Administration will continue to defend vigorously American innovation,\u201d stated Schwab.\u00a0 \u201cU.S. leadership remains critical to improving the global IPR climate.\u201d<\/div>\n
Continuing Concerns in China and Russia<\/div>\n
Again this year, USTR\u2019s Special 301 Report highlights serious IPR concerns with respect to China and Russia, in spite of some evidence of improvement in both countries.<\/div>\n
China<\/div>\n
USTR announced that it will once again retain China on the Priority Watch List and continue monitoring China under Section 306 of the 1974 Trade Act, thus maintaining pressure on China to improve its IPR situation.\u00a0 While the United States continues to seek cooperative channels to work with China to strengthen that country\u2019s IPR regime, high levels of copyright piracy and trademark counterfeiting remain serious concerns.\u00a0 At the same time, the United States is also using the WTO dispute settlement process to address a number of specific deficiencies in China\u2019s IPR regime.<\/div>\n
Russia<\/div>\n
The Administration also continues to work for improvements to the intellectual property regime in Russia.\u00a0 Although Russia has made some progress \u2013 for example, in moving optical disc factories off of government-controlled sites and raiding unlicensed factories \u2013 large-scale production and distribution of IP-infringing optical media and Internet piracy remain significant problems that require more enforcement action.\u00a0 The United States will continue to monitor to ensure that Russia moves to implement a variety of legal and law enforcement improvements to which it committed as part of a bilateral agreement with the United States on Russia\u2019s accession to the WTO.\u00a0 Implementation of these commitments remains essential to completing the final multilateral negotiations on the overall accession package.<\/div>\n
Improvements Noted for Several Trading Partners<\/div>\n
In addition to flagging prominent intellectual property concerns of U.S. trade policy, the Special 301 Report also provides an opportunity to recognize trading partners whose efforts to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement are delivering results both for home-grown innovators in those countries and for U.S. right holders.\u00a0 Egypt, Lebanon, Turkey, and Ukraine are being moved to the Watch List (from Priority Watch List), reflecting improvements in each country\u2019s IPR regime.\u00a0 Two other trading partners \u2013 Belize and Lithuania \u2013 are being removed from the Special 301 Report altogether.<\/div>\n
Background<\/div>\n
This year\u2019s Special 301 Report places forty-six (46) countries on the Priority Watch List, Watch List, or the Section 306 monitoring list.<\/div>\n
There are nine (9) countries on this year\u2019s Priority Watch List: China, Russia, Argentina, Chile, India, Israel, Pakistan, Thailand, and Venezuela.\u00a0 Countries on the Priority Watch List do not provide an adequate level of IPR protection or enforcement, or market access for persons relying on intellectual property protection, in absolute terms and\/or relative to a range of factors such as their level of development.\u00a0 Priority Watch List countries will be the subject of particularly intense engagement through bilateral discussion during the coming year.<\/div>\n
Thirty-six (36) trading partners are on the lower level Watch List, meriting bilateral attention to address IPR problems:\u00a0 Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Czech Republic, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Greece, Guatemala, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Jamaica, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Republic of Korea, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Vietnam.<\/div>\n
The Administration will conduct Out-of-Cycle Reviews for Taiwan and Israel to assess progress on specific IPR issues.<\/div>\n
Canada has taken some significant steps in the past year and, given the importance of the outstanding issues and maturity of its economy, we look forward to additional action in the coming months on the IP reforms identified as key priorities by the Government of Canada.<\/div>\n
Paraguay will continue to be subject to Section 306 monitoring under a bilateral Memorandum of Understanding that establishes objectives and actions for addressing IPR concerns in that country.<\/div>\n
The implementation of Free Trade Agreements (FTA) negotiated with the United States constitutes an important element in IPR improvements.\u00a0 FTA partner countries have undertaken important improvements in IPR legal frameworks in keeping with the obligations reflected in the FTAs.\u00a0 Our most recent FTAs also reflect these high standards and we welcome the commitments made to improve intellectual property protection and enforcement by future FTA trading partners, including Colombia, Panama and Korea.<\/div>\n
On October 23, 2007, United States Trade Representative Susan Schwab announced that the U.S. Government will seek to negotiate an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA).\u00a0 This is a new and dynamic effort to combat the challenges of counterfeiting and piracy today.\u00a0 The ACTA is envisioned as a leadership effort among trading partners that will raise the international standard for IPR enforcement.<\/div>\n
Despite some encouraging developments, the detailed country discussions in the Special 301 Report make clear that numerous IPR problems persist around the world.\u00a0 Trade in counterfeit pharmaceuticals continues to be a particularly grave concern in light of the risks to human health and safety, and the United States continues to be actively engaged in addressing this serious problem.\u00a0 The United States will also remain focused on combating large-scale piracy of optical media and the widespread counterfeiting of trademark-protected consumer and industrial goods.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
Parrafo especial sobre Chile extra\u00eddo del documento oficial:<\/strong><\/div>\n
CHILE
\nChile will remain on the Priority Watch List in 2008. Chile\u2019s IPR performance continues to fall well below expectations for a U.S. free trade agreement partner. The United States remains concerned about inadequate protection against unfair commercial use of undisclosed test and other data generated to obtain marketing approval for pharmaceutical products and insufficient coordination between Chile\u2019s health and patent authorities to prevent the issuance of marketing approvals for unauthorized copies of patented pharmaceutical products. While some U.S. pharmaceutical companies have reported positive outcomes in patent infringement cases, the underlying weaknesses in Chile\u2019s legal regime require resolution in order for Chile to fully implement its obligations under the U.S.-Chile FTA Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The United States also remains concerned about continuing copyright piracy and trademark counterfeiting. Chile\u2019s Congress is continuing to consider legislation to implement various provisions of the FTA regarding Internet service provider liability, limitations and exceptions to copyright protection, and enforcement and penalties against copyright infringement. Further amendments to Chile\u2019s IPR legislation are needed to bring Chile\u2019s IPR regime into line with its multilateral and bilateral commitments. The United States will continue to work together with Chile on the implementation of its IPR commitments in the FTA.<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Declaraci\u00f3n de AmCham ante clasificaci\u00f3n de Chile\u00a0 por segundo a\u00f1o en Priority Watch List por parte del USTR de EE.UU.:\u00a0\u00a0 “Le preocupa a la C\u00e1mara Chileno Norteamericana de Comercio (AmCham), que existan visiones diferentes entre los Gobiernos de Chile y EE.UU. en esta materia, especialmente por ser un elemento perturbador en las relaciones comerciales que […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","news_tax":[],"user_type":[],"class_list":["post-7110","news","type-news","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Declaraci\u00f3n de AmCham ante clasificaci\u00f3n de Chile\u00a0 por segundo a\u00f1o en Priority Watch List por parte del USTR de EE.UU.:\u00a0\u00a0 “Le preocupa a la C\u00e1mara Chileno Norteamericana de Comercio (AmCham), que existan visiones diferentes entre los Gobiernos de Chile y EE.UU. en esta materia, especialmente por ser un elemento perturbador en las relaciones comerciales que […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AmCham Chile\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-04T14:55:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/noticia\\\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/noticia\\\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\\\/\",\"name\":\"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-25T17:26:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-04T14:55:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/noticia\\\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/noticia\\\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/noticia\\\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/\",\"name\":\"AmCham Chile\",\"description\":\"C\u00e1mara Chilena Norteamericana de Comercio\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/amchamchile.cl\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile","og_description":"Declaraci\u00f3n de AmCham ante clasificaci\u00f3n de Chile\u00a0 por segundo a\u00f1o en Priority Watch List por parte del USTR de EE.UU.:\u00a0\u00a0 “Le preocupa a la C\u00e1mara Chileno Norteamericana de Comercio (AmCham), que existan visiones diferentes entre los Gobiernos de Chile y EE.UU. en esta materia, especialmente por ser un elemento perturbador en las relaciones comerciales que […]","og_url":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/","og_site_name":"AmCham Chile","article_modified_time":"2017-09-04T14:55:44+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/","url":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/","name":"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL - AmCham Chile","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-25T17:26:48+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-04T14:55:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/noticia\/amcham-y-la-propiedad-intelectual\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"AMCHAM Y LA PROPIEDAD INTELECTUAL"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/#website","url":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/","name":"AmCham Chile","description":"C\u00e1mara Chilena Norteamericana de Comercio","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news\/7110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/news"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news\/7110\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"news_tax","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news_tax?post=7110"},{"taxonomy":"user_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/amchamchile.cl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/user_type?post=7110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}